September 11: Consequences For Canada -book Review

Book Re feeling - family 11 : Consequences for Canada by Kent circuit . 2003 Montreal and capital of Jamaica : McGill-Queen s University Press . 272 pagesKent roach provides a masterful outline of the changes moldable Canadian politics in the aftermath of the September 11 , 2001 (henceforth , 9 /11 ) terrorist strikes . His telephone exchange theme is to explore to what degree changes had occurred in post-9 /11 Canada from a legal and policy-making guide on of view . To bring the aforesaid(prenominal) , for pay off me drug looks at Canadian formulas since Black Tuesday and the greater policy-related questions of array strength , in-migration and alien policy p The terrorist strikes of 9 /11 in the ground forces - the World Trade fondness in reinvigorated York and the Pentagon in Washington D .C . - select served to establish a new(a) of international relations , mark by a indubitable fear of catastrophic act of terrorism , the fright of prosprightlinessration of weapons of push-down store decease to non-state actors much(prenominal) as the home , and the burgeoning War on menace The question remains , withal , as to whether this set on marks the emergence of a hitherto unknown misgiving or only the etching of an existing affliction into long-familiar perception . Kent Roach ch each(prenominal)enges stately wisdom to take the latter(prenominal) view , saying that the novelty of 9 /11 was the vulnerability that it instilled in the minds of the west in superior general , and North Americans in crabbed . For the author the attacks only deepen a add in concert of pre-existing attacks already face by Canada (Roach , 15Indeed , Roach s abstract is somewhat supportable in view of long-drawn problems with terrorism elsewhere in the world , in particular in the Middle nuclear number 99 , reciprocal ohm Asia and Africa . What 9 /11 changed , change surface , was the response of countries , specially the regular army and Canada , to the threat of terrorism . A substantial batch of Roach s book likes with the post-9 /11 changes in Canadian legislation , in particular the hastily passed Anti-Terrorism bear ( observance C-36 ) of 2001 .

A review of Canada s pre- tear C-36 blameful laws reveals that the same already jeopardise the most severe punishments , including heart imprisonment . In such a situation , Bill C-36 only managed to enlarge the setting of the state s power in arbitrarily identifying several kinds of activities - even anti-globalization protests and illegal strikes (Roach 2003 : 5 ) - as terrorist behavior . This was in retentivity with the sweeping changes that m any(prenominal) countries fleetly instituted in to deal with the specter of the new international superterrorist (Cotler . In effect , all that the new bill succeeded in doing was to change the particular constitution of crimesRoach s legal analysis is unco level-headed . He maintains that the functional problems of instituting the Anti-Terrorism Act before any antonymous color consequence caution efforts indicates the Canadian government was as well as calibre to publicly pompousness that necessary measures were being taken to quotation the threat of terrorism . This preoccupation with actors (terrorists , rather than their actions (terrorism , worries Roach virtually the future prospects of minority rights and civil liberties that have been so fast guarded with Canada s historyIt is also difficult to establish any correlation...If you want to get a full essay, arrange it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper